THE COURT FOUNDVIOLATION8/26/2026
- RESPONSIBLE PARTY
- THE OTHER PARTY
- APPLICABLE CODE
- MLC § 6.02The No-Blocking RuleVIEW APPLICABLE CODE →
- CONFIDENCE
- 97%
FACTS CONSIDERED
A friend knowingly kept calling during a conversation with a lady, despite being told, merely because he wanted to talk.
RULING
VIOLATION. The No-Blocking Rule applies by analogy. Repeated, non-urgent calls knowingly disrupted a respectful conversation. Case closed.
REMEDY
He must observe a 72-hour callback embargo, buy the next round, and deliver all future non-urgent thoughts by text under twelve words.
