MAN LAWAUTHORITY
FILED MAN LAW RULING · ML-2026-948992

The Nothing Urgent Phone Siege

MLC § 6.02 · The No-Blocking Rule

BACK TO COURT CASES
THE COURT FOUNDVIOLATION8/26/2026
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
THE OTHER PARTY
CONFIDENCE
97%

FACTS CONSIDERED

A friend knowingly kept calling during a conversation with a lady, despite being told, merely because he wanted to talk.

RULING

VIOLATION. The No-Blocking Rule applies by analogy. Repeated, non-urgent calls knowingly disrupted a respectful conversation. Case closed.

REMEDY

He must observe a 72-hour callback embargo, buy the next round, and deliver all future non-urgent thoughts by text under twelve words.

BACK TO PUBLIC DOCKET