THE COURT FOUNDNO VIOLATION8/11/2026
- RESPONSIBLE PARTY
- NO RESPONSIBLE PARTY
- APPLICABLE CODE
- MLC § 3.03The Warning RequirementVIEW APPLICABLE CODE →
- CONFIDENCE
- 98%
FACTS CONSIDERED
A friend wanted a neck tattoo reading “GOAT.” The person asking warned him that people could give it an embarrassing meaning.
RULING
NO VIOLATION. The Warning Requirement applies. The warning came before ink made the mistake permanent. That is proper friend duty. The Court of Man Law has spoken. Case closed.
REMEDY
No sentence. The friend should reconsider the wording before entering the tattoo chair.